|
Baba Jarnail Singh Ji -
A
Response to Lamba
Bijla Singh
Baba Jarnail Singh Ji
Bhindranwale was a prominent Sikh preacher and a leader during the late 70s and
early 80s. He led the Sikh community during one of the most crucial times of the
Sikh history when the Indian government was using every tactic in the book to
disunite the Sikhs. He was a man of principles who lived his life according to
the teachings of Guru Granth Sahib Ji. His bravery, fearlessness, and true
character were loved by the masses in the Sikh community. His preaching and
speeches illuminated a hope of freedom in the people of Punjab.
The government launched
an attack on full scale to crush the same hope of freedom which resulted in
martyrdom of Baba Jarnail Singh, destruction of several Gurdwaras, dishonor of
women and deaths of thousands of innocent Sikhs including women and children.
Subsequent to the attack, he came to be known as a true martyr. His popularity
and fame was seen as a “threat” by the central government. To slander his true
character and reputation the government used media, press, and television to
spread misinformation about him and labeled him as a “terrorist”. Unfortunately,
some ignorant people have started to believe in such misinformation one of which
is Puneet Lamba who has written an article “Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale: Five
Myths” in which he has tried very unsuccessfully to prove that Baba Jarnail
Singh was a terrorist. This article is written for the purpose of responding to
his misconceptions and clearing the doubts raised by him in the minds of the
Sikhs.
Baba Jarnail Singh
sacrificed while defending Darbar Shaib which makes him a martyr and a respected
true hero in the eyes of the majority of the people in the Sikh community.
So “Myth 5” and “Myth 2” are only myths and not facts. However, other three
“myths” are nothing but cooked up lies and gross misinterpretation of Lamba. Let’s
take a look at each of the “myths”.
Myth 4 – Religion and
Politics
Mr. Lamba fails to
recognize the ‘Miri Piri’ concept in Sikhi. While Darbar Sahib is the religious
sovereignty of the Sikhs, Akal Takhat Sahib is the seat of Sikh polity and a
powerful symbol of Sikh sovereignty which stands right in front of Darbar Sahib.
Although Baba Jarnail Singh had no ambition to become a political leader he
never overlooked the importance of having political power. In his speeches he
clearly stated that he had no wish to become a political leader. [1]
By saying the above he only represented himself not anyone else in his group or
his associates.
The purpose of having
his associates run for political seats was to have a representation of the Sikh
community on political level. His mission was clearly stated by him in one of
his speeches “to take Amrit, read Bani, give up intoxicants, preach unity and be
attached to Guru Granth Sahib only and encourage others to do the same”.[2]
To say that Baba
Jarnail Singh had no link with politics is highly foolish. Throughout his career
he demanded the government to accept Sikhi as a separate religion and the
Anandpur Resolution of 1973. Both required modifications in the Indian
Constitution which clearly is a political move. According to Dr. A. R. Darshi
“His main
aim was not simply to bull doze the Nirankari offensive but also to strive for
implementation of Anandpur Sahib Resolution adopted by the Akali Dal in 1973.
And if the union government refused to concede that demand then to aspire for
independent state as was promised by the Indian National Congress before
attainment of independence in 1947.”
[3]
A religious man like
Baba Jarnail Singh cared for his community and had realized that the Sikh
community needed political representation in the government so that legitimate
decisions could be made by the government concerning the Sikhs. He had studied
the Sikh philosophy according to which religion perishes without political
sovereignty. He himself never wanted to become a political leader but he never
discouraged other Sikhs from entering into politics.
Myth 3 – Baba Jarnail
Singh and Khalistan
Baba Jarnail Singh was
a saint-soldier of Guru Sahib and was fully aware of the Sikh tenets. According
to the Sikh philosophy “Religion perishes without political sovereignty”.
[4] Baba Jarnail Singh openly spoke against the police atrocities on
innocent Sikhs and dishonor of the Sikh women. In his speeches he mentioned
numerous times that Sikhs were being treated as slaves and inferior to Hindus.
Witnessing the atrocities how could any moral person sit around and support the
Indian government? His demands were clear and bold.
“We wish to live in
Hindustan. We wish to live as equal citizens. The Center should tell us whether
it wants to keep us with it or not. If the Center wants to keep us with it, it
should give us our full rights according to the sacrifices we have made…If it
wishes, it can keep us with it or if it wishes, it can call us terrorists and
extremists and separate us. It is their job. Don't put the blame on us.”
[5]
Hence, it is clear that
Baba Jarnail Singh never opposed the demand of Khalistan. What he supported was
equality, freedom and life of dignity as first class citizens.
“If they keep us with
them, among them, we shall not accept living as second class citizens. We shall
live as first class citizens and work as equal partners.”
[6]
He very well knew that
the government would never agree to this and would never change the Constitution
in which under Article 25 Sikhs are classed as Hindus. The demand for Khalistan
was neither against the Sikh philosophy nor was it opposed by the Sikh
community. Guru Sahib himself established many cities, lived like a King and
Sikhs called Him “The True King”. This was not any different than establishing
an independent state for the Sikh community. Sikhs like Baba Banda Singh, Nawaab
Kapoor Singh, Sardar Jassa Singh, Sikh Misls and many others had established the
Sikh rule. Baba Jarnail Singh supported a country in which Sikhs could enjoy
equal rights and have freedom be it in India or Khalistan. By not listening to
the Sikh demands and attacking the Sikh Gurdwaras the Indian government sent a
clear message to the Sikh community that there was no place for them in India as
first class citizens.
Myth 1 – Baba Jarnail
Singh and Terrorism
Baba Jarnail Singh was
a true Sikh who lived his life according to Sikh beliefs. For him "Physical
Death I do not fear, Death of the Conscience is a Sure Death" was the way to
live. He opposed the brutality of the Indian government against the Sikhs and
for this very reason was branded as a “terrorist”. The government considered
every Amritdhari (baptized) Sikh a terrorist and threat to the Nation.
Baba Jarnail Singh
preached the teachings of Guru Sahib which was to keep arms and rehat. By
spreading the message of Guru Sahib he did nothing wrong. According to Dr. A. R.
Darshi
“Ideology professed and advocated by Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale was not
entirely new. It was exactly the same as enunciated by Guru Nanak Dev Ji and
developed by Guru Hargobind Ji and Guru Gobind Singh Ji…..what Sant Bhindranwale
did was that he revived the true tenets of the Khalsa and gave it a new
dimension.”
[7]
Baba Jarnail Singh
started preaching the Sikh beliefs as taught by Guru Sahib. A significant
increase in the number of Sikhs was seen as a threat to the “Indian unity” and
the government used its entire media to malign his character in the public.
Unfortunately, Mr. Lamba fell for this trap. We shall see that Lamba had
purposely ignored and kept quiet about all the brutalities and tortures by the
Indian officials on Sikhs. Most of his arguments are based on hearsay not
reliable facts. Answers to his statements (in red) are as follows:
Violent
thoughts seemed second nature to Bhindranwale. He often made extremely cruel
remarks with utmost sincerity, 'If a true Sikh drinks, he should be burnt
alive’.
The statement is
nowhere to be found in his speeches and has no reference. Even if we assume that
such statement was said by him it was directed towards people who misrepresented
the Sikh identity. The Indian government had hired many criminals known as
“Cats” who disguised themselves as Sikhs, got drunk, and looted the public and
raped women. Their only job was to humiliate the Sikhs. Why is Lamba forgetting
that the tenth Guru Ji Himself burnt alive these kind of people? Had Baba
Jarnail Singh been of violent nature he would’ve ordered his associates to kill
non-Sikhs and rape their women but on the contrary it was the government that
engaged in such activities.
Tavleen
Singh discovered that in Bhindranwale's darbar (court), 'concepts like
non-violence were mocked and sneering remarks made about Gandhi.
First of all, Gandhism
concept of non-violence is not according to the teachings of Guru Sahib. The
Sikh Gurus taught Sikhs to arm themselves and fight for their rights. This is
why keeping of Kirpan (Sword) was made mandatory for all Sikhs. Not fighting for
rights, honor of women and dignity of all might have been the idealistic views
of Gandhi but is not the nature of Sikhs. Baba Jarnail Singh supported the same
line of thinking and rejected Gandhism.
“Can those who are the
sons of the valiant guru, whose symbol is the sword, ever accept a woman like
Mahatma as their father? Those are the techniques of the weak, not of a race
that has never bowed its head before any injustice - a race whose history is
written in the blood of martyrs.”
[8]
Bhindranwale advised,
“To kill is bad but to have weapons and not fight for justice is worse.”
[9]
In fact, it was Gandhi
who mocked Guru Gobind Singh Ji and used foul language by calling him a
“misguided patriot”. [10] If opposing Gandhi (a mere human being)
makes Baba Jarnail Singh a terrorist then by the same argument opposing Guru
Gobind Singh Ji (greatest of all) makes Gandhi even a greater terrorist. Baba
Jarnail Singh spoke against non-violence that would prevent a person from
protecting his honor and dignity. Gandhi was a racist person and responsible for
millions of deaths during the partition in 1947. He betrayed the Sikh community.
To expect any respect for Gandhi from the Sikhs is insane and highly irrational.
To learn about the true
version of Gandhi, I suggest everyone to visit www.gandhism.net.
Harmit
Singh Batra was in the Darbar Sahib complex on April 13, 1978 and quotes
Bhindranwale, 'We will not allow this Nirankari convention to take place. We are
going to march there and cut them to pieces!
The reference is highly
biased and totally false. April 13th is a very auspicious day for the
Sikhs. On this day ‘Nirankaris’ were carrying out anti-Sikh activities by
insulting the Sikh tenets and Guru Granth Sahib. The government fully supported
such campaign. Sikhs went to stop these activities in a peaceful protest but
they were fired upon. 13 Sikhs were brutally killed and several other Sikhs were
wounded. This peaceful march was sent by Baba Jarnail Singh. Even after the
massacre of the Sikhs the matter was handled in legal ways. If he wanted to act
in a violent way he would not have sent a peaceful march. According to Tavleen
Singh:
"Contrary to the
popular belief that he (Jarnail Singh) took the offensive, senior police sources
in the Punjab admit that the provocation came in fact from a Nirankari official
who started harassing Bhindranwale and his men. There were two or three
Nirankaris in key positions in the Punjab in those days and they were powerful
enough to be able to create quite a lot of trouble. The Nirankaris also received
patronage from Delhi." (Tavleen Singh: Terrorists in the Temple, in The Punjab
Story, edited by Amarjit Kaur et al., Roli Books, New Delhi, 1984, page 32.)
I highly doubt Lamba
ever tried to verify Batra’s sayings.
After the
assassination of the Nirankari leader Gurbachan Singh on April 24, 1980,
Bhindranwale is universally acknowledged to have remarked that if he ever met
Ranjit Singh, the suspected killer, he would weigh him in gold (i.e. reward him
with his weight in gold).
Gurbachna was not an
innocent person. He was killed for insulting Sikhi and speaking blatantly
against the Sikh Gurus. He killed many Sikhs and the government always took his
side. He killed 13 Sikhs in 1978 on the Sikh holy day. He desecrated Guru Granth
Sahib and claimed himself to be greater than the Sikh Gurus. He even wrote books
against the Sikh Gurus containing fake information. The government failed to
deliver justice and showed no respect for the Sikh religion. Ranjit Singh’s
action was accepted and honored by the Sikh community. If the government can
honor its soldiers for killing the enemy then why can’t the Sikh community honor
its fellow brothers for punishing its enemies?
On August
17, 1983, Bhindranwale asked Sikh youth to buy a motorcycle and a revolver.
This is true but
Lamba’s motives are to misrepresent Baba Jarnail Singh’s image so expecting him
to look at the facts would be a mistake. Why exactly did Baba Jarnail Singh say
these words? Because everyone had realized the fact that instead of serving the
justice the government was killing innocent Sikhs and filing no cases.
Disappearance of Sikh youth in Punjab had become very common. Hindus in other
states were forcibly cutting Sikhs’ hair and insulting the Sikh identity. The
final option left was to buy weapons to protect themselves as instructed by Guru
Sahib. If the government won’t do the job then people have the complete rights
do it themselves. During Mughal Empire, Guru Sahib bought horses and weapons and
instructed the Sikhs to do the same. He raised an army and taught Sikhs to
always fight for justice.
By following the
concept of Miri Piri and asking Sikhs to follow the teachings of Guru Sahib
(raising arms) he had done nothing wrong. According to Dr. A.R. Darshi “The
tradition of arming the Sikhs was introduced by Guru Hargobind Ji…He then
instructed the Sikhs to offer him weapons and horses instead of money. He
accepted weapons and horses at Akal Takhat Sahib from His followers…..Sant
Bhindranwale simply revived this tradition in letter and spirit and gave it a
new dimension by substituting revolvers and guns with swords and spears and
motor cycle with horse. He therefore did not commit any offense by following the
Gurus. The cynics may criticize him for revival of the age old tradition of the
Khalsa.”[11]
What Sant Jarnail Singh
preached was totally in accordance to Sikh principles. He preached Sikhs to
defend themselves and fight for justice. According to him
"A Sikh is never an
oppressor but only defends himself and his people. I have never, he said,
initiated any attack with my tongue or my pen or with my sword. I only answer
back or retaliate to actions initiated by the enemies of the Sikhs."
[12]
Baba Jarnail Singh made
it clear in his speeches that by keeping and carrying weapons it is a sin to
dishonor women and harm innocent people but it is a greater sin to keep weapons
and not fight for rights, honor and dignity. [13]
I ask Mr. Lamba to
prove how asking Sikhs to arm themselves was against Sikhi? Sikhs were armed by
the Sikh Gurus themselves and asking them to follow the instructions of Guru
Sahib can only be wrong in the eyes of ignorant people. If carrying weapons to
defend honor and justice and to fight for truth makes one a terrorist then what
does one have to do to become a patriot? Do today’s governments not arm their
countrymen? Why are they not called terrorist countries?
During a
speech on September 20, 1983, Bhindranwale stated clearly that he would
'embrace' Sikhs who exacted revenge upon those who were guilty of torturing,
killing, or humiliating Sikhs. He said, 'Getting away from there is your job,
protecting you here [in the Darbar Sahib complex] is mine.
May I ask what is wrong
with such a statement? Since when did punishing the murderers, rapists and
killers become an act of terrorism? It has been stated before that the
government was not only not arresting the criminals but giving them the full
support to rape and kill Sikhs. Under such circumstances if Sikhs won’t take the
matters into their own hands and punish the criminals then who will? What
exactly does Lamba expect? Should Sikhs have stayed in their homes quietly
waiting for these criminals to show up at their doors to rape their women while
police stood watching? Lamba is a big fool to be thinking in that manner. He
should’ve studied little bit of Sikh history before writing an article
misrepresenting a true Sikh hero. If justice is not served then Sikhs know how
to deliver it.
“It is an age old
tradition of the Khalsa to fight the tyrants and not to submit themselves to
tyranny. If thus the Congress government contemptuously branded them as a
lawless people and oppressed them they are justified to meet arms with arms.”
[14]
On November
17, 1983, Bhindranwale bluntly demanded 'that all Hindus should leave Punjab.
It is very idiotic to
be quoting a Hindu who is extremely against Sikhs. Baba Jarnail Singh made no
such claims. In fact it was Hindu leaders and politicians who said that all
Sikhs outside of Punjab will be killed. Hindu organizations like Shiv Sena
raised many anti-Sikh slogans such as “We are not going to let any second or
third group exist, we are not going to let a turban remain on any head”.
[15] Chief Minister of Punjab, Darbara Singh, stated that he will
crush all Sikhs demanding the recognition of their distinct identity. Bhajan Lal,
Chief Minister of Haryana and Keval Krishan claimed to forcibly kick out all the
Sikhs living outside of Punjab. [16] Lamba seems to have turned his
back on that. Why?
And in one
edition Lala had written in an editorial comment that Taura [Tohra, then
president of the S.G.P.C.] and Ajnoha [then jathedar of the Akal Takht] are
traitors. On that day in a great fury he [Bhindranwale] called upon someone to
read aloud what Lala had said. There was quiet. 'Our turban has been torn from
our heads,' he proclaimed. Then one of his followers asked, 'What are your
orders?' Again in anger, he said 'Orders, you need orders! What orders? Are you
blind?' Now you see he did not say anything. And they said it. 'O.K.' meaning
thereby, we'll finish this man. So, then, 3-4 days later, Lala was coming from
Ludhiana and they fired upon him.
Twisting words seems to
be another talent of Lamba. The editor Lala (person who was killed) had printed
anti-Sikh pictures and wrote derogatory comments about the Sikh Gurus. He openly
printed insulting comments on Sikh identity for years. He also stated that all
Sikhs in Haryana (neighboring state of Punjab) will be killed. He vehemently
supported the anti-Sikh groups such as Nirankaris. Not only that, he even
appeared as a star defense witness and gave a false statement against the Sikhs.
Yet the government did nothing. Instead the government provided him with its
security forces. It was his preposterous propaganda and outrageous actions
against Sikhism that provoked and angered the Sikh youth to such an extent that
two of them gunned him down in broad day light in 1981 while he was traveling in
his car from Ludhiana to Jalandhar. [17]
Baba Jarnail Singh gave
no orders to kill him. He was arrested under suspicion but later released since
the government had no concrete evidence to arrest him or prove him guilty.
[18]
Nachhatar
Singh, arrested by the police for the murder of Lala Jagat Narain, is said to
have fingered Bhindranwale for ordering the killing.
According to A.R.
Darshi “The police officers who interrogated Sant Bhindranwale in the
district of Ludhiana failed to extract any evidence against him; even then he
was detained in the jail for over a month.” [19] Perhaps now
Lamba should study the other side of the story and not take every word of the
government and its puppets blindly.
The
hijackers of an Indian Airlines plane on September 20, 1981 claimed to be
members of the Dal Khalsa and demanded the release of Bhindranwale, who had been
arrested in connection with the murder of Lala Jagat Narain. In a speech,
Bhindranwale 'praised his young lieutenants' for the hijacking.
Sikh hijackers hijacked
a plane not for Baba Jarnail Singh but in protest against violation and insults
of the Sikhs and their rights. After he was arrested, the police killed 200
Sikhs and burnt copies of Sikh Holy Scriptures. In protest, the plane was
hijacked. No passenger was harmed and the plane landed safely on the Indian soil
but all Sikh hijackers were punished. On the other hand when Panday brothers
hijacked a plane demanding the release of Indira Gandhi they were awarded with
high ranking positions. Is this justice? If hijacking a plane is wrong then why
weren’t Panday brothers given the same punishment? Why is it that Sikhs are
punished for the same action Hindus are awarded for? This incident showed that
the government had more respect for a human (Indira Gandhi) than Guru Granth
Sahib.
On July 18,
1982, a police party from the Beas Thana in Amritsar district stopped a jeep.
Most of the occupants were residents of Bhindranwale's gurdwara Gurdarshan
Parkash at Chowk Mehta. They attacked the police and were arrested. No case was
initiated.
This is a fabricated
story of the police to justify the arrests. Thousands of innocent Sikhs have
been tortured and killed by the police in the name of “terrorism” but no cases
were registered. This doesn’t mean the innocent ones who were killed are the
real culprits. The police are the real criminal here since no case was
registered. Otherwise, they would’ve exposed themselves.
Whilst the
formally authorized Sikh code of conduct requires unshorn beards only for
amrit-dhari (baptized) Sikh men, Bhindranwale demanded unshorn and open beards
for all Sikh men
Sikh code of conduct
requires open and unshorn beards for all Sikhs. Cutting or trimming hair is a
taboo in Sikhi. According to Rehatnamas tying of beard is prohibited.
Whereas
'nobody was ever refused an interview, he refused to surrender to anyone but
sufficiently orthodox Sikh policemen.
There is big difference
between an interview and an arrest. During the arrest the Hindu police greatly
insulted the Sikhs by taking off their turbans. Baba Jarnail Singh asked the
Sikhs to arrest him to avoid insult. This was not an illegal action because the
government accepted his demand.
While he
professed the highest standards of Sikhism, he practiced gender discrimination.
Baba Jarnail Singh was
a true Sikh. He preached the same message to men and women equally. He supported
the practice of only Sikh men administering the baptism ceremony which is widely
accepted by the Sikh community.
Although he
viewed modernity as evil, he had no compunctions about using modern firearms.
What exactly is
“modernity” that Lamba is talking about? If going against the principles of
Sikhism is called “modernity” then yes he was against it. Keeping weapons is
completely in accord with the Sikh teachings and has been part of the Sikh
traditions for over 350 years.
Whereas
many Sikhs regard him as a 'messiah, his 1984 prophecy failed to materialize:
'In the next ten years Sikhs will get their liberation. This will definitely
happen.
Neither is Baba Jarnail
Singh regarded as a messiah nor did he make such prophecy. He said “The day
Indian army attacks Golden Temple; the foundation of Khalistan will be laid.”[20]
Lamba is only fooling himself to think that by using his invalid no proof
rubbish he could convince Sikhs to start hating a true hero like Baba Jarnail
Singh.
Conclusion
I close this rebuttal
by appealing Mr. Lamba to study the life of Baba Jarnail Singh according to the
Sikh philosophy not according to his point of view. He shouldn’t fall for Indian
propaganda and for once use some rationality to confirm his hypothesis. Only
then will he realize that Baba Jarnail Singh was an ideal Sikh who for the honor
of Sikh Nation sacrificed his life. No terrorist has ever been praised or
remembered by the Sikh Nation. If Baba Jarnail Singh was a terrorist he would
not have been labeled as a “Shaheed” and given the title of “Sikh of 20th
Century”. He was a man of vision and a great leader who in a very short period
of time woke up the Sikh Nation to become conscious of their rights and
sovereignty.
“Sant Bhindranwale was
a genius and a born leader compared to Harchand Longowal. He had far greater
vision and foresight. He had a remarkable inquisitive insight and intuitive
power. He was a symbol of indomitable courage, valor and spiritual power…..Such
a leader is born once in a while.”
[21]
References
1)
Ranbir Singh Sandhu,
Struggle for Justice: Speeches and Conversations of Sant Jarnail Singh Khalsa
Bhindranwale, pg. 285
2) Sant
Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale: Speech on 22 February 1984
3) Dr.
A.R. Darshi, The Gallant Defender, pg. 27
4) Gurbilas
P: 10, Bhai Sukha Singh
5) Sandhu,
pg. 112
6) Sandhu,
pg. 211
7) Dr.
A.R. Darshi, The Gallant Defender, pg. 52
8) Sant
Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale: Speech in 1983
9) Cynthia
Mahmood, Fighting for Faith and Nation, pg. 46
10) Sachi
Sakhi, Sardar Kapoor Singh, 74-76
11) Darshi,
pg. 53
12) Harry
Reasoner, CBS News 60 minutes, 10 June 1984
13) Sandhu,
pg. 78
14) Darshi,
pg. 67
15) Sandhu,
pg. 278
16) Sandhu,
pg. 77
17) Vir
Sanghvi, The Giani and Bhindranwale, Imprint, February 1986.
18) Darshi,
pg. 43
19) Darshi,
pg. 45
20) Sandhu,
pg. 77
21) Darshi,
pg. 36 |